from

It was impossible for us to get a bank account in this country, or insurance coverage in this country, and unfortunately we lost a lot of shareholders as well […] The number of activists isn’t huge, but their impact has been incredible […] There needs to be an understanding that this is a threat to all industries. The tactics could be extended to any other sectors of the economy.”

–  Brian Cass, Managing Director of Huntington Life Sciences, on the efficacy of the Stop Huntington Animal Cruelty campaign

The urgency of resistance to the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) cannot be overstated. Following the election of the billionaire, white supremacist and heteropatriachal Donald Trump, Energy Transfer Partners (ETP) Chief Executive Officer Kelcy Warrren –  – has stated that he is “100% confident” that Trump would facilitate completion of the DAPL route through unceded Oceti Sakowin territory. Trump, , has up  in Energy Transfer Partners and Phillips 66, two of the key partners in DAPL.

Read more for information about shareholders, construction companies, and other targets:

The Obama administration’s Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), in anticipation of a transfer of authority and jurisdiction to the Trump administration, is still anticipated to approve the final easement – the sacred water of the Missouri River – at any moment. After months of empty pandering, in which the USACE had politely (and futilely) requested that Dakota Access, LLC (DAPL) and ETP voluntarily halt construction until a decision on the easement could be made, it appears that the Obama administration is either going to officially approve the desecration and theft of sacred land, or going to continue to delay decision, under the , while claiming that any continued construction on “Corps land” is not currently permitted until a decision has been reached. ETP dismisses the move to delay as nothing but a  at the expense of the company’s profits.

Despite the USACE’s official stance that work cannot continue on the “Corps land” that borders the water, DAPL operates with violent indifference. , clandestinely appearing near the militarized Missouri River crossing site, during the early morning hours of November 16, and construction operations have not so much as staggered in the wake of the USACE decision. CEO Kelcy Warren asserts that . Energy Transfer Partners  on November 15th, seeking a Judge’s approval to continue construction without the final USACE permit. But a regulatory or court decision could be , leaving a months-long gap where Dakota Access can continue to operate with impunity. Even if the current Presidency continued to stall on its administrative decisions, lest it risk the tarnishing of its ostensibly progressive image on climate change and fossil fuel infrastructure, it is abundantly clear that under Trump, DAPL will get all state and capital backing that it needs to realize its colonial project.

Meanwhile, on the ground of Oceti Sakowin, indigenous resisters, land defenders, and water protectors continue to fight with resilience every day. Invoking the 1851 Treaty of Ft. Laramie, the , through which DAPL hopes to operate. In spite of extreme state violence and the coming harsh winter, hundreds continue to take  and to defend sacred indigenous land.  is leading the resistance along the easement that routes the pipeline to cross under the water. International solidarity actions are increasing in frequency and intensity, and  with resistance on the land. On November 15th, , with estimates of over . ETP has claimed in court that the organized resistance of water protectors and land defenders has already . ETP also conceded that if it does not complete the project by the January 1st deadline, it may have to renegotiate its contracts with backers and financiers, in a global oil economy that is making Bakken oil production and distribution increasingly  for investors.

In response to this momentum, ETP has only escalated construction efforts, and, in collusion with private security firms and militarized state and federal law enforcement agencies, escalated violence and repression against the movement. Hundreds of arrests have been made, with many facing felony charges. Countless have suffered horrible  at the hands of police. The Federal Aviation Administration has created a large  above Standing Rock. There are reports of torture at the hands of police – including  and detaining water protectors in .  surrounding the encampment and where DAPL intends to drill under the Missouri River. The 24-hour floodlights have been functioning as sleep deprivation and psychological warfare against the water protectors. The state of North Dakota just approved an additional  protection of the Dakota Access Pipeline project, bringing the current debt total to approximately $10 million.

All of this is to say that any measure of efficacy against state and corporate actors has always come from organized grassroots resistance led by front lines communities most impacted by violence, marginalization, and subjection, and never from the institutions and structures of power and capital. Neither Obama nor Trump will stop the Dakota Access Pipeline. DAPL is a modern settler colonial project, made possible through the operations of white supremacy, capitalist accumulation, land theft, police violence, and neoliberal deregulations and finance markets. Make no mistake, the current infrastructure of state violence and racist nation building existed long before Trump stirred settler unrest and panic under the pretense of “white working class” (or rather, ) populism. Strategic resistance and solidarity is the only path to liberating the land and challenging colonial-capitalist power.

Solidarity with Standing Rock has been outlined before. Whether a symbolic civil disobedience or a Facebook check-in, the avenues of solidarity are diverse. But solidarity can be more than symbolism. Land defense on the ground has been brilliantly orchestrated for months, and is a seemingly never-ending source of inspiration. Land defenders and water protectors have taken huge risks, again and again, and faced extreme brutality in response. How has solidarity been measuring up? Has the level of dedication and critical analysis been symmetrical with the work of water protectors on the land? How can solidarity organizing itself become an integral strategic supplement to the direct and ongoing resistance that is taking place at Oceti Sakowin?

This is a call to build a sustained pressure campaign against the pillars of support for the Dakota Access Pipeline. In order to complete the pipeline, DAPL must be able to access capital markets, construction labor, and government permits. All of these create a constellation of pressure points within a system of power that makes DAPL not only economically and politically feasible, but profitable, in the scheme of capitalist accumulation. The goal of pressure campaigns is to disrupt the process of accumulation by targeting both capital and power. Although the website NoDAPLSolidarity.org has already outlined key pillars of support for DAPL, a clear analysis or strategy has yet to be produced that identifies the operations of power that make DAPL possible.

Pressure campaigns, “comprehensive campaigns,” or “political-economic disruption campaigns” has a long and vibrant history in left and radical movements. The strategy has developed over the second half of the last century through the organizing of anti-racist and non-traditional labor movements of the 1960s and 1970s (such as the ), the anti-apartheid movement in the UK (), the anti-sweatshop movements of the 1980s and 1990s (particularly ), Earth First!’s Redwood Summer and  campaigns of the early 1990s, the anti-globalization movement of the early 2000s, anti-imperial and anti-war corporate campaigns targeted at munitions manufactures throughout the so-called War on Terror (), the radical animal liberation movement spanning the 1990s until now, in particular the  campaign, and the international  movement against Israeli occupation and apartheid on  stolen Palestinian land. Countless examples exist, and a myriad of tactics, including residential protests, economic sabotage and underground direct action, have been employed to make these campaigns extremely effective. The commonality that they all share is an analysis of how power operates throughout the political economy of institutions, industries and enterprises that are the targets of their mobilizing efforts. These movements became dynamic, living risk factors in the process of the accumulation of capital, giving them the ability to challenge power by leveraging financial and reputational risk through the targeting of shareholders, credit lenders, insurance providers, security contractors, business affiliates, IT providers, and other pillars of support.

Not only did these movements pressure these monolithic institutions in the political economy, they were able to break down their inner-workings and create power maps of individuals who held substantial power and privilege in the decision-making processes. If capital itself represents the quantifiable commodification of power, then disrupting the accumulation of capital in order to halt projects like DAPL requires challenging the many diffuse ways in which power maintains itself. In this regard, the Stop Huntington Animal Cruelty (SHAC) campaign was one of the most brilliant and formidable pressure campaigns in recent memory. SHAC was able to bring the world’s largest banks, financiers, and insurance companies into severing business contracts, divesting shares, or withholding loans from the campaign’s primary target, Huntington Life Sciences (HLS), an infamous multinational vivisection contractor. Lauren Gazzola, a SHAC organizer at the time and former political prisoner, describes the campaign’s strategy:

“SHAC sought to drive HLS out of business through a strategy of secondary targeting, personal protest, siege mentality, and illegal direct action. By targeting companies affiliated with HLS—its investors, customers, stockbrokers, insurers, service providers, et cetera—and demanding that these companies stop doing business with the lab, SHAC aimed to starve HLS of necessary services and capital. By protesting not only against monolithic corporations, but also against the employees of HLS and affiliated companies, SHAC sought to pierce the corporate façade and more directly pressure corporate decision-makers. By branching out beyond traditional protests to engage in residential picketing, in-office disruptions, phone blockades, and a variety of other protest tactics, SHAC aimed to create a siege mentality, so that the annoyance and inconvenience of the SHAC campaign were constant features in the lives of those who worked for HLS and affiliated companies.”1

Few grassroots campaigns have had such an impact on the global market economy. In addition to getting hundreds of secondary and tertiary targets to stop doing any sort of business with HLS, SHAC was able to get HLS , the largest stock exchanges in the world.

For Judi Bari, an organizer with Earth First! and the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), this kind of campaign model was a crucial supplement to direct action taking place on the land, and one that allowed for pressure to flow up the corporate hierarchy:

“The purpose of Corporate Fall was to bring the demonstrations to the corporate offices and lavish homes of the people who are actually benefiting from the destruction of the earth. Somebody who is making seven or nine bucks an hour cutting down the last of the Redwood forest is not benefiting from the destruction of the earth […] They’re being exploited to accomplish the destruction of the earth. When the corporations are done they’re going to lay them off, and they’re not going to have any money to relocate or to retrain or anything. What we’re trying to do is to make it really clear who is to blame. We’re not trying to fault the people who are working in the industry who are also being exploited. We’re trying to lay the blame where it belongs.” ()

Regarding the effectiveness of pressuring seemingly impenetrable and immense social, political and economic structures and institutions, Omar Barghouti, a founder of the BDS movement, in an , finds the impact to be easily measured:

“It’s very strange to hear anything about the effectiveness of the movement. I think that’s settled by now. Companies are abandoning Israeli projects, pension funds are abandoning Israeli projects, major churches, major academic associations across the world, especially in the U.S., are taking action.”

This is not a history or analysis of the SHAC campaign, redwood forest defense, BDS, or any other effective campaign against capital and power. This is a call to adopt a similar strategy of pressure and siege tactics against the capital markets, and individual decision makers within them, and all who continue to make DAPL, land theft, and genocide possible. Coupled together, the resilience of the defense of the land at Standing Rock, sustained strategic pressure against these pillars of support, diversity of tactics and tactical and strategic innovation, and the demystification of the operations of power within monolithic social institutions has the very real potential of disrupting the accumulation of capital and land – bringing DAPL to a screeching halt.

It is not hard to figure out how power flows through the political economy. Corporations have shareholders, investors, lenders, executives, boards of directors. These are tangible and specific individuals, with their shared values, social statuses and networks, performative roles, and social, economic and material vulnerabilities. Corporations often list some of this information publicly on their websites, especially if they sell publicly traded stock and are forced to be accountable to shareholders. Financial and organizational information can be accessed through shareholders reports, Security Exchange Commission (SEC) or Canadian Securities Administration (CSA) filings, public databases such as  or , state-by-state business registries, business media sites like the Wall Street Journal, and private libraries and specialized financial databases, such as the  (some large, well-funded NGOs have access and might play nice). People in power have home addresses, tax records, property assessment records, and are often very easy to find on people search engines such as InstantCheckMate, Pipl, WhitePages, or Spokeo. Don’t underestimate the power of Google – it is ubiquitous and can be extremely effective. These individuals also participate in the world of social media – Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and especially LinkedIn – and their otherwise innocuous daily social lives suddenly can become rich with pivotal information for strategic and tactical planning. What matters to them? Where do they play golf, drink wine, or enjoy their yachts? What information can be exploited to create the siege needed to bring them into fold, and to get them to sever ties with DAPL? What tactics can be innovated and produce the desired effect?

Speaking on SHAC, two political economists wrote of the critical impact of this strategy:

“SHAC has provided organizers with important lessons on how PEDCs [political-economic disruption campaigns] provoke the anxieties of capital. Investors have a twofold fear: 1) fear of being personally targeted; 2) fear that the fear of others will drive down the value of stock.”2

Those anxieties extend beyond just lenders, investors, or shareholders, but encompass all aspects of the capitalist accumulation process. For organizers, those considerations should be taken for all institutions, enterprises, state bodies, and individuals that participate in the colonial-capitalist political economy.

Food and Water Watch, Rainforest Action Network, and NoDAPL Solidarity have already produced a breadth of information on  for the Dakota Access Pipeline, including a list of shareholders and credit lenders, security providers, and construction contractors, and some of those companies’ corporate and branch locations. Some focus has already trended towards  that underpins the pipeline. Norway’s largest bank, DNB, recently  related to DAPL, after an international solidarity campaign,  of Scandinavia, pressured the financial behemoth to withdraw support, and it is threatening to  amid concerns about worsening situations on the ground. Large environmental NGOs globally, such as Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth, have begun backing the # campaign. Concurrently, some solidarity activists and water protectors have begun using higher-pressure tactics, such as  It is high time that the movement sees a marriage of these strategies and tactics.

These organizations and support networks have outlined the skeletal system of DAPL’s continued operation. What follows below adds flesh to the bone. , but up until this point they have been treated as inert and homogenous bureaucracies. Those who occupy specific positions of agency and influence and are instrumental in this regime of capital are obscured by the pretense of corporate power. Moving forward with this information, those who take action in solidarity should consider how each of these individuals fits into the system of pressure points that keep DAPL afloat, and how to use tactical innovation and diversity and the siege mentality to pressure them. What level of pressure will it take? What range of tactics and strategic timeline will get us there? Who wields influence? Who has the most at stake? What is the balance between power and investment? For example, Kelcy Warren could stop the project with a phone call, but he and his company also stand to gain immensely from DAPL. Energy Transfer Partners is a fossil fuels energy company, and its accumulation of capital is based entirely on projects like DAPL. But banks and construction companies have other investments, clients, customers, and assets – other means of generating profit. To put it simply, DAPL needs them, but they don’t need DAPL.

The following is a fragment of the power map of the Dakota Access Pipeline project, specifically designed to “pierce the corporate façade” and demystify the political economy of the monolithic corporations and state agencies involved. These are the names, positions, and home addresses* of specific actors in the processes of colonization, land theft, desecration of sacred sites, and poisoning of water at Standing Rock, Oceti Sakowin territory. But this is only part of the picture. Each of these companies and institutions have dozens of executives and directors all over the country, and many abroad. Research them and figure out the power map in your area. #NoDAPL solidarity means targeting them, developing sustained strategies, and employing a diversity of tactics with unrelenting and intensifying pressure – creating the mass siege needed to shut this project down and reclaim indigenous land, water, and sovereignty from 500 years of settler colonial incursion and violence.

That colonial violence is manifest this moment on the plains of Standing Rock. On November 20th, police used  – in below freezing temperatures – against water protectors who were attempting to move damaged military vehicles that were blocking Highway 1806. Over 160 were injured, including a woman who may  due to the extent of tissue damage, and two who suffered cardiac arrests (an  remains in critical condition). In response, an indigenous-led coalition of groups at Standing Rock have called for a , escalating from November 25 to December 1, focusing on the financers of DAPL and the police departments involved in the brutality. Actions are already taking place. With the Army Corps of Engineers now announcing the  of the Standing Rock encampments on December 5th, there has never been a more pressing moment to shift the strategy for global solidarity.

Now is the time to strike. The state of urgency requires our full attention, commitment, and critical praxis in this moment. Think it through. Organize. Take action. Take immediate action. Take strategic action. Take frequent action. Hit them hard. Hit them where it hurts. Keep on hitting until DAPL is lost to the annals of history and struggle for liberation. What are you willing to do protect sacred water and move in solidarity with this historic and vibrant indigenous resistance and anti-colonial struggle?

  1. Gazzola, Lauren. “Bad Things Happened: Metaphorical Fingerprints, Constellations of Evidence, and Guilt for Association.” Vt. L. Rev. 40 (2015): 819-820.
  2. Cochrane, D. T., and Jeff Monaghan. “Fight to Win! Tools for Confronting Capital.” The Accumulation of Freedom: Writings on Anarchist Economics (2012): 113

* Please keep in mind that most of these addresses have not been confirmed beyond online tax and property assessment records. Therefore, there is always a chance that some may be out of date. Verify, if possible. Use discretion. This list is compiled not to encourage illegal action, but simply for educational and outreach purposes only.

Dakota Access Pipeline Stakeholder Companies
Company/Institution  Name Position Affiliated Residential Address(es)
Energy Transfer Partners Kelcy L. Warren Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 5323 Park Ln, Dallas, TX 75220
Matthew S. Ramsey President, Chief Operating Officer 3800 Hanover St, Dallas, TX 75225
Sunoco Logistics Partners Robert W. Owens President and Chief Executive Officer 272 Cheswold Ln, Haverford, PA 19041
Matthew S. Ramsey Chairman of the Board 3800 Hanover St, Dallas, TX 75225
Enbridge Energy Partners C. Greg Harper President, Gas Pipelines & Processing 2421 Wroxton Rd, Houston, Texas 77005
8091 Western Sky, Park City, UT 84098
Al Monaco President and Chief Executive Officer 62 Hamptons Manor NW, Calgary, AB T3A 6K1, Canada
Wilhelmus Jan Van der Ven Vice President, Power Operations 5104 SW View Point Terrace, Portland, OR 97239
Mark Andrew Maki President and Principal Executive Officer of EEQ 13719 Heron Field Ct, Houston, TX 77059
Phillips 66 Greg Cyril Garland Chairman and CEO 11610 Bistro Ln, Houston, Texas 77082
Tim G. Taylor President 1178 Northridge Dr, Prescott, Arizona 86301
71 Heritage Hill Cir, The Woodlands, TX 773811403
Marathon Oil Corporation Lee M. Tillman President and Chief Executive Officer 38 Legato Way, Woodlands, TX 77382
T.M. (Mitch) Little Executive Vice President, Operations 834 Riedel Dr, Houston, TX 77024
Dennis H. Reilly Non-Executive Chairman of the Board 5117 Pulchella Dr, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73142
27650 Marina Isle Ct, Bonita Springs, FL 34134
DAPL Credit Lenders and Shareholders
Company/Institution  Name Position Affiliated Residential Address(es)
Mizuho Bank Jerry Rizzieri President and CEO Mizuho Securities USA 1261 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10128
Andrew Dewing Managing Executive Officer and Head of North American Banking 419 E 57th St, New York, NY 10022
Hiroshi Suehiro Senior Managing Executive Officer and Head of the Americas 200 E 65th St, New York, New York 10065
Minako Nakamoto President and CEO, Mizuho Bank (USA) 1 Columbus Pl, Apt N25d, New York, New York 10019
Rob MacKinnon Senior Vice President at Mizuho Bank, Ltd., Canada Branch 3200 Wardmore Pl, Richmond, BC, V7C 1S7, Canada
Stephen Reid Vice President, Corporate Banking – Mizuho Bank, Ltd. 2399 W 34th Ave, Vancouver, BC V6M 1G8, Canada
Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ  Stephen E. Cummings President and CEO of MUFG Americas Holdings Corporation 300 E 55th St, Apt 22c, New York, New York 10022
401 Hempstead Pl, Charlotte, North Carolina 28207
Kanetsugu “Sugu” Mike Group Head of the Global Business Group of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG) and Deputy President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Global Business Unit of The Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ (BTMU) 3 Sylvan Ln, Scarsdale, New York 10583
Timothy H Wennes West Coast President and Head of the Regional Bank for MUFG Union Bank, N.A. 2544 Greenbank Rd, Thousand Oaks, California 91361
William (Bill) Mansfield President and Chief Executive Officer of MUFG Securities Americas, Inc 251 W 95th St, Apt 7s, New York, New York 10025
Matthew D Hill Managing Director, SVP, Washington Regional Manager, MUFG Union Bank, N.A. 5524 NE Windermere Rd, Seattle WA 98105-2849
John Colbourne Managing Director at MUFG Union Bank 22431 SE 30th St, Sammamish, WA 98075-9333
CitiGroup Michael Louis Corbat Chief Executive Officer 212 W 18th St, New York, New York 10011
135 Central Park W, Apt 7Nc, New York, New York 10023
26891 Wedgewood Dr, 103, Bonita Springs, FL 34134
4405 W Greens Place, Jackson, Wyoming 83014
Michael Edward O’Neill Chairman of the Board 2549 Tantalus Dr, Honolulu, HI 96813
Wells Fargo & Co. Timothy (Tim) J. Sloan President and Chief Executive Officer 1320 Woodstock Rd, San Marino, CA 91108
David M. Carroll Senior EVP, Wealth and Investment Management 735 Hempstead Pl, Charlotte, NC 28207
2621 Southpoint Ln, New London, NC 28127
Stephen W. Sanger Chairman of the Board 16572 Grays Bay Blvd, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391
Mary Knell Chief Executive Officer, Washington and Western Canada 770 Maple St, Edmonds, WA 98020-3436
DNB Capital/ASA Giacomo Landi Executive Vice President and General Manager at DNB 11 E 29th St #24C, New York, NY, 10016
Thomas Tangen DNB Head of Corporate Banking New York 4705 Center Blvd Apt 2110, Long Island City, NY 11109-5695
Einar Gulstad Senior Vice President at DNB Bank 1 Eaton Ct, Houston, TX 77024
SunTrust William H. Rogers, Jr. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 37 Muscogee Ave NW, Atlanta, GA 30305
1385 Wesley Cir NW, Atlanta, GA 30327
Mark A. Chancy Wholesale Banking Executive 580 Old Cobblestone Dr, Atlanta, GA 30350-5431
TD Securities Bharat Bhagwanji Masrani Group President and Chief Executive Officer, TD Bank Group 340 E 23rd St Apt 4E, New York, NY 10010
1701 Locust St Unit, 1804, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
225 S Hamilton Dr, Apt 304, Beverly Hills, California 90211
Bob Dorrance Group Head, Wholesale Banking, TD Bank Group and Chairman CEO & President, TD Securities 301 Rose Park Dr, Toronto, ON, M4T 1R8, Canada
Brian M Levitt Non-executive Chairman of the Board 71 Tibbits Hill, Lac Brome, QC, J0E1K0, Canada
Mauro Manzi Senior Vice President, Pacific Region, at TD Bank Group 14731 30A Ave Surrey, British Columbia, V4P 3E6, Canada
Pipeline Construction Company
Company/Institution  Name Position Affiliated Residential Address(es)
Michels Corporation Patrick D Michels Co-owner and President 750 Meadow Ridge Ln, Brownsville, WI 53006
Timothy J Michels Co-owner and Vice President 409 E Verleen Ave, Waunakee, Wisconsin 53597
Brian P Johnson Executive Vice President N7430 Niagara Lane, Fond Du Lac, WI 54937-8059
Kevin P Michels Vice President 945 Country Club Ln, Fond Du Lac, Wisconsin 54935
Steven R Michels Vice President W2230 Commercial St, Poy Sippi, Wisconsin 54967
Robert H Westphal Senior Vice President – Construction Operations 848 Regency Reserve Ct, Naples, Florida 34119
Robert H Westphal Senior Vice President – Construction Operations 1311 Pine Isle Three Lakes, Wisconsin 54562
Robert H Westphal Senior Vice President – Construction Operations 695 Red Fox Run, Fond Du Lac, WI 54937
Robert C Osborn Senior Vice President – Michels Pipeline Construction Division N5538 Glacier Ct, Fond Du Lac, Wisconsin 54937
Andrew Bermack Vice President of Pipeline Business Development at Michels Corporation 1506 Adkins Rd, Houston, Texas 77055
Ben Nelson Vice President of Western Operations at Michels Pipeline Construction 8715 NE 21st St, Clyde Hill, Washington
Drill Manufacturer
Company/Institution  Name Position Affiliated Residential Address(es)
Vermeer Corporation Jason Mark Andringa President & Chief Executive Officer 2634 Hemel Dr, Pella, IA 50219
Mary Vermeer Andringa Chair of the Board 10682 NE 46th Ave Mitchellville, IA 50169-9500
Construction Labor Union
Company/Institution  Name Position Affiliated Residential Address(es)
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Marion “Bubba” Davis Director of Teamster Building Material & Construction Trade Division 318 2nd St, Bamberg, SC 29003
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Company/Institution  Name Position Affiliated Residential Address(es)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Todd T. Semonite Lieutenant General, Commanding General and Chief of Engineers 10230 Fairfax Drive, Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060
Scott Alan Spellmon Brigadier General, Commander, Northwestern Division 8212 NW 16th Ave, Vancouver, WA 98665
Dr. James J. Hearn Director Regional, Business Directorate, Northwestern Division 950 SW 21st Ave, Apt 1006, Portland, OR 97205
David J. Ponganis Director of Programs, Northwestern Division 2926 SW Fairmount Blvd, Portland, OR 97239
Colonel Torrey A. DiCiro Deputy Division Commander, Northwestern Division 2825 NW Lacamas Dr, Camas, WA 98607-7629